YES 0.651 H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/empty.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could successfully be proven:



HASKELL
  ↳ BR

mainModule Main
  ((dropWhile :: (a  ->  Bool ->  [a ->  [a]) :: (a  ->  Bool ->  [a ->  [a])

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.
Binding Reductions:
The bind variable of the following binding Pattern
xs@(vv : vw)

is replaced by the following term
vv : vw



↳ HASKELL
  ↳ BR
HASKELL
      ↳ COR

mainModule Main
  ((dropWhile :: (a  ->  Bool ->  [a ->  [a]) :: (a  ->  Bool ->  [a ->  [a])

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
undefined 
 | False
 = undefined

is transformed to
undefined  = undefined1

undefined0 True = undefined

undefined1  = undefined0 False

The following Function with conditions
dropWhile p [] = []
dropWhile p (vv : vw)
 | p vv
 = dropWhile p vw
 | otherwise
 = vv : vw

is transformed to
dropWhile p [] = dropWhile3 p []
dropWhile p (vv : vw) = dropWhile2 p (vv : vw)

dropWhile0 p vv vw True = vv : vw

dropWhile1 p vv vw True = dropWhile p vw
dropWhile1 p vv vw False = dropWhile0 p vv vw otherwise

dropWhile2 p (vv : vw) = dropWhile1 p vv vw (p vv)

dropWhile3 p [] = []
dropWhile3 wv ww = dropWhile2 wv ww



↳ HASKELL
  ↳ BR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ COR
HASKELL
          ↳ Narrow

mainModule Main
  (dropWhile :: (a  ->  Bool ->  [a ->  [a])

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Haskell To QDPs


↳ HASKELL
  ↳ BR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ COR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ Narrow
QDP
              ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_dropWhile1(wx3, wx40, wx41, ba) → new_dropWhile(wx3, wx41, ba)
new_dropWhile(wx3, :(wx40, wx41), ba) → new_dropWhile1(wx3, wx40, wx41, ba)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs: